CO129-322 - Acting Governor May - 1904 [1-5] — Page 220

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

I would ask the O.A.G. for his criticisms on Mr. Howard's letter on 19573/04 before expressing any further opinion. As I am at present advised I agree with the previous minutes but Mr. Howard is sure to come here and I should like fuller information before I see him.

[Stamp or notation: unclear]

H.B.E. [possibly "Hongkong Blue Envelope" or similar notation]

Tapu [likely "Tapu" as in land registry]

No.

Congkong [likely "Hongkong"]

C

HO

Sir

16030

219

04

Government House,

Hongkong, 24th February, 1904.

37014

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 380 of 21st October last respecting the case of Messrs. Stephens and Howard. I have given this matter my careful consideration and I came to the conclusion that the best way to deal with the case would be to grant compensation on the same basis as was done in the Musso's case, reported to your predecessor in Sir Henry Blake's Despatch No. 376 of the 16th August, 1900, since the two properties are similarly situated close together in the same locality. Compensation in the Musso case was settled in an amicable manner, and there is no reason why more liberal compensation should be given in Messrs. Howard and Stephens's case. The Finance Committee of the Legislative Council apparently concur in this view.

Enclosure 1.

2. I enclose copy of the Financial Minute which that Committee has passed. It shows how the additional compensation which I recommend should be paid, is arrived at.

Enclosure 2.

13th January, 1904.

I communicated a copy of your Despatch under acknowledgment and of the minute to Mr. Stephens, and I enclose copy of his reply. The minute will be confirmed at the next meeting of Council and if Messrs. Howard and Stephens accept the additional sum.

To

HE RIGHT HONOURABLE

ALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P.,

&c., &c., &c.

Edit History

2026-06-01 16:11:42 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
I would ask the O.A.G. for his criticisms on Mr. Howard's letter on 19573/04 before expressing any further opinion. As I am at present advised I agree with the previous minutes but Mr. Howard is sure to come here and I should like fuller information before I see him. [Stamp or notation: unclear] H.B.E. [possibly "Hongkong Blue Envelope" or similar notation] Tapu [likely "Tapu" as in land registry] No. Congkong [likely "Hongkong"] C HO Sir 16030 219 04 Government House, Hongkong, 24th February, 1904. 37014 I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 380 of 21st October last respecting the case of Messrs. Stephens and Howard. I have given this matter my careful consideration and I came to the conclusion that the best way to deal with the case would be to grant compensation on the same basis as was done in the Musso's case, reported to your predecessor in Sir Henry Blake's Despatch No. 376 of the 16th August, 1900, since the two properties are similarly situated close together in the same locality. Compensation in the Musso case was settled in an amicable manner, and there is no reason why more liberal compensation should be given in Messrs. Howard and Stephens's case. The Finance Committee of the Legislative Council apparently concur in this view. Enclosure 1. 2. I enclose copy of the Financial Minute which that Committee has passed. It shows how the additional compensation which I recommend should be paid, is arrived at. Enclosure 2. 13th January, 1904. I communicated a copy of your Despatch under acknowledgment and of the minute to Mr. Stephens, and I enclose copy of his reply. The minute will be confirmed at the next meeting of Council and if Messrs. Howard and Stephens accept the additional sum. To HE RIGHT HONOURABLE ALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P., &c., &c., &c.
Baseline (Original)
Iwoned ask the 0.ag for his cuticions on cher Howard's better on 19573/04 before expening avy further opinion. As ab present advised dagree with the previous minutes but hv Howard is sure to come here Ishoned like fuller. information before I see him, auque Atonce HBE Tapul No. Congkong. C HO Sir. 16030 219 04 Government House, Hongkong, 24th. February, 1904. 37014 I have the honour to acknowledge the re- 05 ceipt of your Despatch No. 380 of 21st. October last respecting the case of Messrs. Stephens and Howard. I have given this matter my careful consideration and I came to the conclusion that the best way to deal with the case would be to grant com- pensation on the same basis as was done in the Musso's case. reported to your predecessor in Sir Henry Blake's Despatch No. 376 of the 16th. August, 1900, since the two properties 30518 are similarly situated close together in the same locality. 00 Compensation in the Musso case was settled in an amicable manner, and there is no reason why more liberal compensation should be given in Messrs. Howard and Stephens's case. The Finance Committee of the Legislative Council apparently consur in this view. onclosure! 2. I enclose copy of the Financial Minute which that Committee has passed. It shows how the additional compensation which I recommend should be paid, is arrived at. osure 2 13th Eaternary, 1904. I communicated a copy of your Despatch under acknowledgment and of the minute to Mr. Stephens, and I enclose copy of his reply. The minute will be confirmed at the next meeting of Council and if Messrs. Howard and Stepehns accept the additional Sum HE RIGHT HONOURABLE ALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P., &C.. &c...
2026-06-01 16:11:42 · Baseline
View content

Iwoned ask the 0.ag for

his cuticions on cher Howard's

better on

19573/04 before expening avy further opinion. As ab present advised dagree with the previous minutes but hv Howard is sure to come here

Ishoned like fuller. information before I see him,

auque

Atonce

HBE Tapul

No.

Congkong.

C

HO

Sir.

16030

219

04

Government House,

Hongkong, 24th. February, 1904.

37014

I have the honour to acknowledge the re- 05

ceipt of your Despatch No. 380 of 21st. October last respecting

the case of Messrs. Stephens and Howard. I have given this

matter my careful consideration and I came to the conclusion

that the best way to deal with the case would be to grant com-

pensation on the same basis as was done in the Musso's case.

reported to your predecessor in Sir Henry Blake's Despatch

No. 376 of the 16th. August, 1900, since the two properties 30518

are similarly situated close together in the same locality. 00

Compensation in the Musso case was settled in an amicable

manner, and there is no reason why more liberal compensation

should be given in Messrs. Howard and Stephens's case. The

Finance Committee of the Legislative Council apparently consur

in this view.

onclosure!

2.

I enclose copy of the Financial Minute

which that Committee has passed. It shows how the additional

compensation which I recommend should be paid, is arrived at.

osure 2

13th Eaternary, 1904.

I communicated a copy of your Despatch under acknowledgment

and of the minute to Mr. Stephens, and I enclose copy of his

reply. The minute will be confirmed at the next meeting of

Council and if Messrs. Howard and Stepehns accept the additional

Sum

HE RIGHT HONOURABLE

ALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P.,

&C..

&c...

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.